<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>fix journalism &#187; Citizen journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fixjournalism.com/category/citizen-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fixjournalism.com</link>
	<description>a conversation about journalism's future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:35:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Making information valuable</title>
		<link>http://www.fixjournalism.com/uncategorized/making-information-valuable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fixjournalism.com/uncategorized/making-information-valuable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Donica Mensing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Users]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fixjournalism.com/?p=562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journalists write stories. Most stories are intended to convey information. The strategic thinking that should be the next step &#8212; who needs this information, how might they act on it, how will they find it, how will they share it, how is it useful to them? &#8212; gets little attention in most newsrooms. This piece [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fixjournalism.com/uncategorized/making-information-valuable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What happens when your local newspaper disappears?</title>
		<link>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/what-happens-when-your-local-newspaper-disappears/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/what-happens-when-your-local-newspaper-disappears/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Higdon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citizen journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civic journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fixjournalism.com/?p=516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a mirror post of an editorial I wrote for The Exception Magazine (here for post). I enjoyed writing this because it was written for readers instead of for other journalists. Journalists suddenly noticed their industry looks like all the other ones they write about on Wall Street. Newspapers, such as the Rocky Mountain [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/what-happens-when-your-local-newspaper-disappears/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The incredible shrinking press corps</title>
		<link>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/journalists-might-as-well-be-the-gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/journalists-might-as-well-be-the-gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Duggan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civic journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fixjournalism.com/?p=314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past week a lot has been written about Jon Stewart's skewering of CNBC and the faux-populist Rick Santelli. In the midst of all the praise for what was truly a deserving comedic spanking of arguably the most-watched group of financial journalists on television, others are concluding that Stewart's eight-minute jab-fest was an example of good journalism. Something tells me Stewart - a comedian - would disagree.

While the Daily Show's bit on CNBC was hilarious (video below), it should have prompted every working journalist to engage in some serious self reflection. The piece, instead, held up a mirror to a system that is obviously in need of a fix: journalists with all-access passes to the rich and powerful lobbing softballs at the crooks who got us into this economic mess in the first place. Sure CNBC does not represent every working reporter out there, and there are plenty of good examples of financial journalism that warned of the looming meltdown years before it happened (even though it was tragically and largely ignored by the public - but that's another debate). The problem is we are losing credibility and fast no thanks to the massive cut in resources newspapers are enduring.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/journalists-might-as-well-be-the-gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Part 5: Group 3 prototype, the nomadic community journalist</title>
		<link>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/part-5-group-3-prototype-the-nomadic-community-journalist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/part-5-group-3-prototype-the-nomadic-community-journalist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Higdon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civic journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Micropayments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[think tank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fixjournalism.com/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<h1>GROUP 3 PROTOTYPE</h1>

<h2>The concept</h2>
Our group identified two major problems: the disappearance of local journalism institutions and a public disconnected from journalists. So we wondered, <strong>"how might nomadic journalists work and how would community life continue to be successful?"</strong>

This idea builds on Group 2 (inadvertently), mixes Spot.Us, Innocentive.com, OhMyNews.com, uWeb/iTunes/iNews and other journalism movements: public journalism, citizen journalism, etc.
[...]
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/part-5-group-3-prototype-the-nomadic-community-journalist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Part 4: Group 2 prototype, an incentive for democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/part-4-group-2-prototype-an-incentive-for-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/part-4-group-2-prototype-an-incentive-for-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Higdon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citizen journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[think tank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rob curley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fixjournalism.com/?p=410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<h1>GROUP 2 PROTOTYPE</h1>

<h2>The concept</h2>
This group wanted to develop a point system on a news website. For every activity users do, they receive points. People receive more or less points depending on their level of engagement. For example, commenting on a story nets maybe 2 points, but writing your own story is worth 10.


The site basically becomes a customized delivery system with an incentive to participate in democracy. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/part-4-group-2-prototype-an-incentive-for-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why won&#8217;t readers pay for content? Well they will</title>
		<link>http://www.fixjournalism.com/social-networking/why-wont-readers-pay-for-content-well-they-will/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fixjournalism.com/social-networking/why-wont-readers-pay-for-content-well-they-will/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Higdon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Micropayments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Users]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fixjournalism.com/?p=349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Absolutely right. The argument that people will go elsewhere doesn't jive in one-newspaper towns such as Reno or even San Francisco. If the Reno Gazette-Journal or San Francisco Chronicle started charging for content readers would have absolutely nowhere else to go for local information involving courts, schools, people and business. The New York Times certainly does not cover Reno or San Francisco like readers need it to be covered. And neither do any of the alt publications in town. [...]

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fixjournalism.com/social-networking/why-wont-readers-pay-for-content-well-they-will/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Journalism cannot just save itself or it will fail</title>
		<link>http://www.fixjournalism.com/social-networking/journalism-cannot-just-save-itself-or-it-will-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fixjournalism.com/social-networking/journalism-cannot-just-save-itself-or-it-will-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Higdon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civic journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Micropayments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fixjournalism.com/?p=340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So instead, <strong>news needs to find a way to create something that doesn't only help the journalist</strong>, but helps thousands of other unpaid creative people.

<strong>uNews must be for more than news. It must be for all creative endeavours.</strong> It must be for InnoCentive.com, it must be for people who want to make money off of their own videos, images news, games, information and other content. uNews can't actually be called "uNews."

uNews needs to be for everyone AND news. And it has to be as fun and interesting to be a part of as all of your awesome Apple products. <strong>uNews must be a paradigm shift on how we operate on the Web. It must serve as a focusing point for all communications.</strong> Otherwise, it will fail like the other micropayment systems did.

<strong>Other systems segregated content away from the Web instead of integrating people into each other. That is the key. uNews must CENTALIZE the web instead of further DECENTRALIZING it.</strong>

But wouldn't it be great of a news company made it?  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fixjournalism.com/social-networking/journalism-cannot-just-save-itself-or-it-will-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why micropayments will improve journalism</title>
		<link>http://www.fixjournalism.com/users/why-micropayments-will-improve-journalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fixjournalism.com/users/why-micropayments-will-improve-journalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Higdon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Micropayments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fixjournalism.com/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As most of you know there&#8217;s an interesting debate about using an iNews/iTunes model of journalism to in fact save journalism. A lot of the main ideaists are talking about it as a business model while Shirky is the leader in why it&#8217;s a bad idea. I posit that iNews (or uNews as I&#8217;m calling [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fixjournalism.com/users/why-micropayments-will-improve-journalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The continuing micropayment (uNews) conversation</title>
		<link>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/the-continuing-micropayment-unews-conversation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/the-continuing-micropayment-unews-conversation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Higdon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Micropayments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[think outside the browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fixjournalism.com/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m responding to a fellow young blogger who listed the Top 10 reasons why publications should not charge readers in micropayments. The basic tenents are: Nothing beats free. This completely compromises the link economy. It’s very 2000. It’s uncreative. It’s failed in the past. Micropayments puts open-source journalism years behind. It’s never been done before. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/the-continuing-micropayment-unews-conversation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Credibility and credulity</title>
		<link>http://www.fixjournalism.com/social-networking/credibilty-and-credulity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fixjournalism.com/social-networking/credibilty-and-credulity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Donica Mensing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citizen journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Users]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fixjournalism.com/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a teacher, the evolution in power from media gatekeepers to the individual citizen has tremendous implications for what students (and others) are expected to competently manage. We have an elaborate set of tools designed to help students operate in an environment where information is as scarce as water in a desert, but very little established in our educational institutions for how to intelligently manage a flood. The same analogy holds true for citizens seeking political information, businesses seeking economic information, politicians seeking policy information, etc.

Dan Gillmor, author of "We the Media," describes an aspect of the problem this way in a lengthy and interesting post titled Principles for a new media literacy:]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fixjournalism.com/social-networking/credibilty-and-credulity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

