<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>fix journalism &#187; ego</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fixjournalism.com/tag/ego/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fixjournalism.com</link>
	<description>a conversation about journalism's future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:36:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;re asking the wrong questions:How do we fund/save newspapers?How do we fund/save journalism?How does journalism evolve?What is journalism for?</title>
		<link>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/game-changerhow-do-we-fundsave-newspapershow-do-we-fundsave-journalismhow-does-journalism-evolvewhat-is-journalism-for/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/game-changerhow-do-we-fundsave-newspapershow-do-we-fundsave-journalismhow-does-journalism-evolvewhat-is-journalism-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Higdon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ego]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fixjournalism.com/?p=465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journalists, such as those in the RevenueTwoPointZero conference, cling to news as it's been done. Their entire premise is about preserving what has already fallen. Journalism's fight can be likened to <a href="http://www.terrisfight.org/" target="_blank">Terri Schiavo's case</a>.

The questions we ask:
<ul>
	<li><strong><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">How do we save newspapers?</span></strong></li>
	<li><strong><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">How do we pay for newspapers?</span></strong></li>
	<li><strong><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Why don't people read newspapers anymore?</span></strong></li>
	<li><strong><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Why aren't people engaged with the news?</span></strong></li>
	<li><strong><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">How do we mae people read newspapers?</span></strong></li>
	<li><strong><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">How do we make people become engaged?</span></strong></li>
</ul>
These questions are relevant but I think we need to back up before we try to answer them.

Our problem comes from the fact that we are trying to solve journalism's problem for journalists. The above questions are really the following questions in disguise:
<ul>
	<li><strong><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">How will I stay employed? </span></strong></li>
	<li><strong><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">How will my media company make money</span></strong></li>
	<li><strong><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">How will what I do remain recognizable through this change?</span></strong></li>
	<li><strong><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">How can I do the least amount of change while doing the same thing I've always done?</span></strong></li>
	<li><strong><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">How do I measure successful journalism in this new world?</span></strong></li>
</ul>
Shirky makes it clear that we should be asking different questions. We are the revolutionaries. I posit we should be asking these questions:
<ul>
	<li><strong>What is journalism in 2009 and beyond?</strong></li>
	<li><strong>What is journalism for?</strong></li>
	<li><strong>How do people's lives intersect journalism?</strong></li>
	<li><strong>How do we build a journalism that intersects peoples lives the way people want it to?</strong></li>
	<li><strong>How does journalism restart; what does it look like, what does it sound like, how does it act, how should it work?</strong></li>
</ul>
[...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/game-changerhow-do-we-fundsave-newspapershow-do-we-fundsave-journalismhow-does-journalism-evolvewhat-is-journalism-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The future newsroom?</title>
		<link>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/the-future-newsroom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/the-future-newsroom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Higdon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ego]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsroom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fixjournalism.com/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you blow up everything you think is real and start over from scratch based on the needs of the community and tools of the newsroom, I think a newsroom could look like this (below). The idea came from a class Donica and I are brainstorming about. We want to do something that&#8217;s similar to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fixjournalism.com/news/the-future-newsroom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
